What you should know about sign codes before
you purchase land.
|
| AutoCareForum Site Search |
|
|
| AutoCareForum Site Search |
|
|
In recent
months there has been an emerging trend in city sign codes that is
alarming. As the pendulum continues to swing away from reason thought
sign codes get more invasive. In many municipalities it is now possible
to option or purchase land only to discover that you are not allowed
adequate signage to operate a business.
Recently
I met with an owner who had purchased the land, planned the project,
and with a great deal of effort and expense had been approved for
a car wash project. As I read the sign code I explained that we needed
to go to the city in order to clarify a few questions that the language
of the code raised.
For example.
The code stated that no sign could be placed on a building except
over a customer entrance. The planned sign project showed signs over
the entrance and exit of the car wash tunnel which ran parallel to
the traffic flow. When we reached the appropriate city official and
raised the question we were asked the following. "Will customers
be riding in the car as the car passes through the was tunnel"?
"Yes"! "Then you will be allowed to place a sign over
the tunnel entrance but not the exit." The customer had wrongly
assumed that the exit would also be considered an entrance. The only
way to remedy this was to put a customer entrance door on the exit
end of the tunnel. This means that the sign code now impacts the architectural
planning.
This entrance
issue was very unexceptable in light of another problem in the same
code. On the street where this planned wash was to be located there
were no curb cuts to allow entrance to the wash facility. The entrance
was to be located one block off the main street and 1 block off the
side street, off the main street, that dead ended at the wash property.
According to the codes, there could be no sign on a street where there
was no curb cut. Translation: No sign on the street for this wash
unless it was located down the dead end street and behind the car
wash. The result: This wash could have one building sign facing 50%
of the traffic flow. The architect had shown signs on the building
when the plans were approved that the owner assumed the city would
allow. This was not the case.
At another
planned facility in the same state, a small paragraph, at the bottom
of the code, stated that the signs as represented in the proposal
for any new building would be binding. Many Architects simply place
signs on renderings to represent what might be placed on the building.
As a rule cities never approve signs when they approve a building
plan but according to this language the owner was bound to this simple
representation without any forethought as to the appropriateness,
at this sight, of these represented signs.
It has been
the habit of most to find a great piece of land with great demographics
and get busy with options, purchases, plans, approvals, and bidding
contractors without a lot of thought about the sign codes. In this
very competitive time, in our industry, while cities continue to be
more restrictive, one can no longer take this course of action. If
an owner believes signage is a necessary part of the business equation,
he must first consider if he will even be allowed to have signs on
this property and if he can have the correct signs needed to accomplish
all the dreams set forth in his business plan to his potential banker.
It is necessary to be thorough and give your car wash the maximum
opportunity to succeed. Wise car wash investors must check these codes
before placing options or purchasing land for such a project.
You should
not rely on your own judgment of the language of the code, what the
city employee tells you, or even what an attorney unfamiliar with
sign issues might tell you about codes. You should get an opinion
from someone in the sign industry who is competent to interpret or
at least raise the questions that may be hidden in you code.
Cities usually
have the attitude that poor planning on the business owners part is
not an acceptable hardship for a variance so owners must be vigilant
to be informed on the sign restrictions they may face.
Perry Powell
is a sign consultant to the Car Wash Industry.
He can be reached by:Telephone: 817-307-6484
|
|
|
| AutoCareForum.Com ©
1996-2010 Reproduction for private personal use is allowed. Any other reproduction
in whole or in part, without the express written permission of AutoCareForum.Com
is prohibited. |
|